Capitulum VIII — Taberna Rōmāna
A jeweller's shop, a necklace that costs too much, a ring that fits or does not: the setting is charming, but this is the pronoun chapter. Its Grammatica Latina declines quis/quī, is and ille in one sweep, then hic; its Pēnsum A is one long fill-in-the-gap drill on truncated forms (“Qu-”, “H-”, “ill-”, “c-”). In other words: everything you have met in scattered pieces since capitulum I becomes a system here.
Two cells that change everything
Pronouns do not decline like nouns. Only two cells give them away — but those two are enough to recognise them anywhere:
| genitive sg. (all 3 genders) | dative sg. (all 3 genders) | |
|---|---|---|
| quis? / quī | cuius | cui |
| is | eius | eī |
| hic | huius | huic |
| ille | illīus | illī |
Two facts to keep, and nothing else:
- the genitive singular ends in -īus and is the same in all three genders — where an adjective would say magnī, magnae, magnī;
- the dative singular is likewise a single form for all three genders.
Pretium huius margarītae magnum est. — The price of this pearl is high. Tabernārius huic fēminae ānulum ostendit. — The shopkeeper shows a ring to this woman.
In the plural, the same economy: quibus, iīs, hīs, illīs serve as both dative and ablative, in all three genders.
The neuter in -d
The second pronominal signature, as visible as the first: in the neuter singular, pronouns end in -d, not -um.
illud ōrnāmentum — id pretium — quod ōrnāmentum? — aliud ōrnāmentum
Compare: pulchrum ōrnāmentum, magnum pretium. The adjective says -um, the pronoun says -d.
ille: the far demonstrative
| masculine | feminine | neuter | |
|---|---|---|---|
| nom. sg. | ille | illa | illud |
| acc. sg. | illum | illam | illud |
| gen. sg. | illīus | illīus | illīus |
| dat. sg. | illī | illī | illī |
| abl. sg. | illō | illā | illō |
| nom. pl. | illī | illae | illa |
| acc. pl. | illōs | illās | illa |
| gen. pl. | illōrum | illārum | illōrum |
| dat./abl. pl. | illīs | illīs | illīs |
hic gets the same full table here: hunc, hanc, hoc; huius; huic; hōc, hāc, hōc; hī, hae, haec; hōs, hās, haec; hōrum, hārum, hōrum; hīs.
Macron trap: hoc, nominative/accusative neuter, has a short o; hōc, the ablative, a long ō. And the pronoun hic (short i) is not the adverb hīc “here” (long ī) — the chapter uses both.
Pointing near, pointing far, or merely reminding
The book itself hands you the key, leaning on two adverbs you already know:
| force | equivalent | |
|---|---|---|
| hic ānulus | this ring, near me | = ānulus quī hīc est |
| ille ānulus | that ring, over there | = ānulus quī illīc est |
| is ānulus | the one just mentioned | no pointing: a plain reminder |
quis? or quī? — pronoun or adjective
The same interrogative word has two uses, and Latin distinguishes them by shape:
| used alone (pronoun) | before a noun (adjective) |
|---|---|
| Quis venit? who is coming? | Quī vir venit? which man? |
| Quid vidēs? what do you see? | Quod ōrnāmentum vidēs? which ornament? |
The neuter is where the difference leaps out: quid? “what?” against quod ōrnāmentum? “which ornament?”.
The relative quī quae quod is completed too: quō / quā in the ablative singular, quārum / quōrum in the genitive plural, quās in the accusative plural, quibus in the dative and the ablative plural.
Ecce ānulī in quibus gemmae sunt. — Here are rings with gems in them.
And it can do without an antecedent: Quae margarītās amant ad hanc tabernam veniunt = eae quae…, “those women who…”.
Stating a price: the ablative
With cōnstāre, emere and vēndere, the price goes into the ablative, with no preposition — you pay with that money:
Hic ānulus vīgintī sēstertiīs cōnstat. — This ring costs twenty sesterces.
Three new numbers, all indeclinable: vīgintī (XX), octōgintā (LXXX), nōnāgintā (XC) — plus the book's abbreviation HS = sēstertiī. When the price becomes the predicate of pretium, it goes back to the nominative: pretium est sēstertiī nōnāgintā.
tantus… quantus, satis, nimis
tantus = tam magnus; quantus = quam magnus. Together they say “as big as”, each agreeing with its own noun:
Haec margarīta nōn est tanta quanta illa. — This pearl is not as big as that one.
Careful: tantum is also the adverb “only” of capitulum IV. Two more adverbs stand before an adjective: satis “enough” and nimis “too” (satis parvus, nimis magnum).
The rest in three lines
- alius, alia, aliud declines like a pronoun (neuter aliud), and doubles up: aliae… aliae “some… others”.
- Plural imperative of -ere verbs: the singular -e becomes -ite — aspice! aspicite! — accipe! accipite!
- One more compound of īre: ab-it ↔ ad-it, plural ab-eunt.
- accipere ā/ab + ablative marks the source (“to receive from”), not to be confused with the agent of a passive; and ōrnārī + a bare ablative marks the means (margarītīs ōrnātur).
In one line: genitive sg. in -īus and dative sg., both single forms for all three genders (cuius/cui, eius/eī, huius/huic, illīus/illī); pronominal neuter in -d; hic = hīc, ille = illīc, is = plain reminder; quis? alone but quī? quod? before a noun; quibus dative and ablative plural; price in the ablative; tantus… quantus; satis / nimis before the adjective; aspicite!, abeunt.